Annual report pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)

Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Notes)

v2.4.0.6
Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Notes)
12 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Text Block]
:
Goodwill
The Company is required to perform an evaluation of goodwill on an annual basis or more frequently if circumstances indicate a potential impairment. The annual test for impairment is conducted in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. The Company performs a qualitative assessment of a reporting unit's fair value to determine whether it is more likely than not the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If it is concluded that this is the case, it is necessary to perform the two-step, quantitative, goodwill impairment test. The first step compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill to determine the amount of impairment loss. Fair value of a reporting unit is determined by using a both an income approach and a market approach, as this combination is considered to produce the most reasonable indication of the Company's fair value in an orderly transaction between market participants. Under the income approach, the Company determined fair value based on estimated future cash flows of a reporting unit, discounted by an estimated weighted-average cost of capital, which reflects the level of risk inherent in a reporting unit and its associated estimates of future cash flows as well as the rate of return an experienced investor might expect to earn. Under the market approach, the Company utilized valuation multiples derived from publicly available information for guideline companies to provide an indication of how much a knowledgeable investor in the marketplace might be willing to pay for a company. The valuation multiples were applied to the reporting unit. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in nature and requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including estimates for revenue growth, operating expenses, gross margins, operating margins, discount rates and future market conditions, among others.
Prior to the relocation of Noran Tel production and revenue to Westell Inc., the Company's reporting units, for the purpose of evaluating goodwill, consisted of Noran Tel, Westell, and CNS. After the Noran Tel relocation, the Company evaluates the performance and goodwill for the combined reporting units consisting of Noran Tel and Westell. The combined unit is the same as the Westell segment. The CNS reporting unit does not carry any goodwill.
January 1, 2013 Evaluation
The Company performed its annual evaluation of goodwill as of January 1, 2013. The Company assessed whether it was more likely than not that combined Westell/Noran Tel fair value was less than its carrying amount including goodwill by considering the following factors: macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, financial market considerations, and overall financial performance. Based on these factors, the Company determined it was necessary to perform a two-step goodwill impairment test. The first step of a two-step evaluation performed by the Company tested for impairment by applying a fair value-based test at the reporting unit level. The Company's step-one evaluation indicated impairment. Upon completing the step-two analysis, the Company determined that, pursuant to the standards applied, the full carrying amount of goodwill of $2.9 million was impaired. As a consequence, the Company recorded a charge during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 for the full carrying value of the goodwill. The Company did not recognize any impairment loss on goodwill in fiscal years 2012 or 2011.
Changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill by reporting units are as follows:
(in thousands)
ConferencePlus
 
ConferencePlus
Global
Services
 
Noran
Tel
 
Westell
 
Total
Gross goodwill
$
1,052

 
$
322

 
$
1,890

 
$
9,651

 
$
12,915

Accumulated impairment

 

 
(1,381
)
 
(9,651
)
 
(11,032
)
Currency translation

 

 
314

 

 
314

April 1, 2011 balance, net
1,052

 
322

 
823

 

 
2,197

ConferencePlus sale
(1,052
)
 
(322
)
 

 

 
(1,374
)
Currency translation

 

 
(22
)
 

 
(22
)
March 31, 2012 balance, net

 

 
801

 

 
801

Noran Tel relocation

 

 
(798
)
 
798

 

ANTONE acquisition

 

 

 
2,086

 
2,086

Impairment

 

 

 
(2,884
)
 
(2,884
)
Currency translation

 

 
(3
)
 

 
(3
)
March 31, 2013 balance, net
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$


Goodwill decreased $0.8 million during fiscal 2013 with a $2.1 million increase resulting from the ANTONE acquisition and with a $2.9 million decrease resulting from impairment. As of March 31, 2013, the Company had no goodwill.
Intangible Assets
The Company has an indefinite-lived intangible asset related to the Noran Tel trade name. To determine the fair value of the trade name, the Company calculates the present value of royalty income it could generate if the name was licensed in an arm’s length transaction to a third party. No impairment loss was recognized related to indefinite-lived assets in fiscal years 2013, 2012 or 2011.
Intangible assets with determinable lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their respective estimated useful lives. If the Company were to determine that a change to the remaining estimated useful life of an intangible asset was necessary, then the remaining carrying amount of the intangible asset would be amortized prospectively over that revised remaining useful life. On an ongoing basis, the Company reviews intangible assets with a definite life and other long-lived assets other than goodwill for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that carrying values may not be recoverable. If such events or changes in circumstances occur, the Company will recognize an impairment loss if the undiscounted future cash flow expected to be generated by the asset is less than the carrying value of the related asset. Any impairment loss would adjust the asset to its implied fair value. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013, indicators of impairment became present as a result of the Company's decision to write-down goodwill. The Company performed an evaluation to test intangible assets for recoverability and concluded that no impairment existed as of March 31, 2013. During the years ended March, 2013, 2012 and 2011, no impairment existed with respect to the Company's intangible assets with determinable lives and no significant changes to the remaining useful lives were necessary.
The following table presents details of the Company’s intangibles from historical acquisitions, including the fiscal year 2013 ANTONE acquisition:
 
March 31,
(in thousands)
2013
 
2012
Gross intangible assets
$
42,190

 
$
39,062

Accumulated amortization
(13,458
)
 
(12,566
)
Impairment
(23,868
)
 
(23,868
)
Currency translation
199

 
202

ConferencePlus sale

 
(102
)
Net carrying amount
$
5,063

 
$
2,728


The finite-lived intangibles are being amortized over periods of five to ten years. Finite-lived intangible amortization expense from continuing operations was $0.9 million, $0.5 million and $0.5 million in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011. The following is the expected future amortization by fiscal year:
(in thousands)
2014
 
2015
 
2016
 
2017
 
2018
 
thereafter
Intangible amortization expense
$
943

 
$
941

 
$
846

 
$
553

 
$
499

 
$
929


Net carrying amounts of intangible assets are as follows:
 
March 31,
(in thousands)
2013
 
2012
Finite-lived intangible assets:
 
 
 
Product technology (1)
$
2,832

 
$
464

Customer relationships (1)
1,879

 
1,912

Total finite-lived intangible assets, net
$
4,711

 
$
2,376

Infinite-lived intangible assets:
 
 
 
Trade Name
352

 
352

Total intangible assets
$
5,063

 
$
2,728

(1)
Change due to amortization and adjustments due to foreign currency translation.